
Musings on food, family, and faith. And probably some other stuff.
I had a hunch I wouldn't like this one, but I was pleasantly surprised. Movies set in a future where all has gone to seed don't do much for me. This one was blissfully short (it told a good story, but didn't drag it out) and wasn't as far into the future as I anticipated. The New York City scenes were cool as well. After watching, I read a fews things about the movie that made me realize I missed an entire (and important) piece of the story. Oh well. It was still good.
This one, I knew nothing about going in. I knew there had been some buzz, but I couldn't remember what the buzz was. I'm glad I went in cold. This was a really, really good movie. Very unusual. Very disturbing and creepy. But very good. Also short, but not one that needed to be any longer. I won't say anything else about it, in case you haven't watched and don't know anything about it either. I enjoyed the NYC scenes in this one as well. A lot of the action took place at Columbus Circle, which is where we grabbed the subway when we were there. There is also a scene where the statue of liberty becomes seperated from her head, as you can see from the image above, and the head is found laying on the ground and people stand around and gawk at it. If you recall from our vacation photos, Daniel stood under the left nostril of a full-sized replica of the statue, and I'm watching this scene thinking "I don't think the statue's head is that big - you could fit several Daniels under that nostril." Turns out I was right - they enlarged the head for dramatic effect. Travel is so broadening....
Lots of angst here - starving artist angst, herion angst, HIV angst, gay angst. Not the kind of angst I can really relate to. (I relate to working-mom angst, soccer practice angst, who's-putting-up-the-laundry angst. Granted, not as edgy.) But while I didn't really relate all that well to the story, I did really groove on the music. Lots of songs I've been singing in my head all day after hearing just one time. "Five hundred twenty-five thousand six hundred minutes...." ....... "How we gonna pay-ayyy...how we gonna pay-ayyyy...."
Loved this book. And the movie was true to the book, only they crammed it into too hours. Made it seem very rushed. I would have preferred tacking on another half hour to really tell the story right. It was extremely well-cast, and the costumes were great.
John Travolta is not an attractive man, and he's REALLY not an attractive woman. And his accent drove me NUTS for the entire movie. But everyone else was great - I've become quite the fan of Queen Latifah. She was great in Chicago and in Stranger Than Fiction (in a very understated role). And she was great in this.
Laugh-out-loud funny at times, bordering on stupid at others. Would definitely be a better live show.
Wow. Much like a Jane Austen novel, only without the happy ending. I really enjoyed this one. The woman who plays Molly Weasley in the Harry Potter movies played Jane Austen's mother, and was SUPERB. I'll have to do some research to see how much of this is based on history and how much is movie magic. But definitely a good one.
So, no real duds in my movie marathon. Mark and I will likely watch some more movies when he gets back tomorrow, so I'll try to post on those as well. But don't expect more musicals or period pieces. Not Mark's thing. Probably some sci-fi and things blowing up. Everything has its place.
Wicked, by Gregory Maguire.This is the book the musical is based on. It's the story of how the Witches in The Wizard of Oz came to be witches, good and bad. (According to the musical story, they were college roomies, and the Wicked Witch of the West was just a misunderstoond animal rights activist. I know it sounds crazy, but it works.) I had read that there is much more to the book (there always is).
Gregory Maguire has a lot of books based on the other side of famous stories. Cinderella's Ugly Stepsisters and Snow White are two that come to mind. He has also written a follow-up to Wicked, and might even be working on a third book in the series. This is the first of his books that I've read.
I've only read a few chapters, and so far, I can only say that it's unusual. But that could be a good thing. The Wizard of Oz is a pretty unusual story too, when you think about it.
Change of Heart, by Jodi Picoult.I'm just over half-way through this, and I still don't know what I think about it.
On the one hand, it's the story of a man convicted of murdering a young girl and her stepfather. He's on death row, and is trying to donate his heart when he dies. The person he wants to donate his heart to just happens to be his victim's younger sister, who just happens to need a heart transplant.
On the other hand, this is a book about faith, religion (all kinds, I might add - Christianity in all its forms, Judaism, Agnosticism, Atheism), forgiveness, divinity, and humanity.
It's a very unique story, and while I definitely want to see how it turns out, I don't know how I feel about it. It questions not only things that others believe, but it questions what I believe as well. And while I think questions are critical to any faith worth its salt, that doesn't make it easy to ask them or to answer them.
I will say that I don't think things are exactly as they seem. I've read lots of Picoult's books, and they always seem to have a twist at the end. I'm also noticing that there is very little detail being given about the murders themselves, which leads me to wonder if our murderer is as guilty as they say he is.